*IMPORTANT* Vets with PTSD

If at all possible, do not sign up for the treatments for PTSD. I don't care if they offer you money or some other benefit.
The State is your enemy, it does not care that you put your life on the line for it.
The ruling class cares about one thing only, keeping their power.
There is no such thing as "free" money.
You are in a database. You will soon not be able to own a weapon. Schumer sees you no differently than a felon.
But if you are mentally ill, whether you’re a veteran or not, just like if you’re a felon, if you’re a veteran or not, and you have been judged to be mentally infirm, you should not have a gun.Chuck Schumer.
These things are not a joke. These people play for real. Haven't we already seen the DHS say that returning vets are suspect to becoming home-grown terrorists?
Homeland security sees vets as greatest terror threat.

When a veteran is declared incompetent, the Veterans Administration (VA) appoints fiduciaries, often family members, to manage their pensions and disability benefits. Because of Schumer’s NICS Improvement Act of 2007, the VA also automatically enters the names of those veterans in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which prohibits them from buying or owning firearms. 
According to a report released quietly by the Department of Veterans Affairs in September, 247,243 veterans from the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars were “coded with potential PTSD” between Oct. 1, 2001 and June 30, 2012.

Read the whole story here.

I would strongly suggest you take this very seriously. The State is your enemy. They do not care what you have "done for your country". You are a serf.
Please tell others about this danger to vets. They need to know the truth of what is going on.

Patriot's Lament December 15, 2012: Bill of Rights Death and Flee Babylon

In this episode, on the anniversary of the u.s. Bill of Rights, we talk about how the Bill of Rights is dead, and has been since they were codified into the constitution. We reject class warfare, but understand there is a "Ruling class" that is at war with the Ruled class. We talk about nullification, and about the latest school shooting. We ask why we are so upset with a school shooting, but not the murder of 40 children by the State at Waco. Why was there no outcry when Sammy Weaver, a 14-year-old boy, was shot in the BACK by the State??!! We go on to mock "Smaller government" and we talk about the relationship between drugs given to school kids and the prescription drugs that ALL of the shooters in mass killing have been on since 1998.

Law abiding citizen

I am sick of the term "law abiding citizen" and I am especially sick of it when used in reference to gun rights and gun control.
What does having the Right to defend yourself have to do with some State deciding whether or not you deserve that right based on how law abiding you are to its edicts and proclamations?
If the State says that guns are now illegal, and to own one would be to break the law, are you going to be a law abiding citizen then? What if the State, which is nothing more than a gang of thieves, is unethical; am I still supposed to be a law abiding citizen?
My Right to defend myself, my family, and my property predates the State. The 2nd amendment didn't invent the Right to be armed, it was already known that one had the Right to be armed.
What gives an illegitimate State the Right to say that only "law abiding citizens" can be armed? Abiding by what laws? Whose laws? The State's arbitrary law that merely is intended to enslave us?
Quit using that term. It's another way of saying law abiding serfs.
 Boot licking slaves.
You think when the colonist revolted against the King he thought that they were law abiding citizens? Should they have been disarmed because of it? Should they ever have been allowed to be armed?
Following the regulations, statutes and political laws of a State has nothing to do with the Right to be Armed.
Our Right to be armed is specifically to resist an overpowering and corrupt State; secondly, for personal self- defense, and lastly to be able to feed ourselves by hunting.
We know why Patrick Henry cherished the rifle.
An armed people.
Not a "Law abiding citizen".

Say What?

So if you don't believe and regurgitate the police story, they will have you prosecuted? If you doubt or say anything contrary to "Their microphone" you will be hunted down? And prosecuted?
And the NRA wants these jokers to be at every school?
We don't need more State to fix the State. Come on, folks.
So is the 1st amendment null and void?

Gun control is gun violence

From Jim today:

If you advocate gun control, you are advocating gun violence...gun control IS gun violence.

"What you're advocating is, that the president should write on a piece of paper something that says, if you own one of these, you have to hand them over, and if you don't we're going to send men with guns to your house. Not just to take away your guns, (and by the way, they're going to have semi automatic rifles when they show up at your house) but to take you away and put you in a cage. Not because you did anything wrong, not because you threatened anybody, but because you owned a piece of hardware that the government didn't approve of. THAT IS GUN VIOLENCE! Every law is a threat backed by the ability and the willingness to use deadly force. The government isn't asking nicely. When they pass a gun law, they say, if you disobey this we put you in a cage. And we will use whatever level of force that it takes to get you in our custody and cage you, and if you resist, when we show up with guns, and you resist, we will shoot you. So if you're out there advocating gun control thinking that's peaceful and compassionate, think about what you're actually advocating. You're actually advocating that millions of people who haven't threatened or hurt anyone should be threatened with violence by men with guns for owning a thing...so, gun control is the euphemism for it, gun violence is what it actually is.

 

 

Larkin Rose