I realized I never put this on the blog. It is called the ""Quirin Precedent".
A link to what it is can be found here: Quirin Precedent
This is extremely important because this precedent is what your representatives are spouting off as to why the passage of the NDAA is constitutional.
Key phrase: Law of War.
Sec. 1032(3) of the NDAA, DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.
DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR. – For purposes of this subsection, the disposition of a person under the law of war has the meaning given in section 1031(c), except that no transfer otherwise described in paragraph (4) of that section shall be made unless consistent with the requirements of section 1033. 9
Rules under the Law of War according to the Supreme Court in the Quirin Precedent were different than rules under the Articles of War. Why?
The Law of War is in effect when the country is under Martial Law.
Under the Law of War, the Constitution has no authority. The Congress is claiming and has even put in the legislation authority to the President under the Law of War.
So we connect the dots........ we are under Martial Law, and all power is held by the Executive under the Law of War.
Your representatives have put it in record.
A link to what it is can be found here: Quirin Precedent
This is extremely important because this precedent is what your representatives are spouting off as to why the passage of the NDAA is constitutional.
Key phrase: Law of War.
Sec. 1032(3) of the NDAA, DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.
DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR. – For purposes of this subsection, the disposition of a person under the law of war has the meaning given in section 1031(c), except that no transfer otherwise described in paragraph (4) of that section shall be made unless consistent with the requirements of section 1033. 9
Rules under the Law of War according to the Supreme Court in the Quirin Precedent were different than rules under the Articles of War. Why?
The Law of War is in effect when the country is under Martial Law.
Under the Law of War, the Constitution has no authority. The Congress is claiming and has even put in the legislation authority to the President under the Law of War.
So we connect the dots........ we are under Martial Law, and all power is held by the Executive under the Law of War.
Your representatives have put it in record.
No comments:
Post a Comment