Scott Horton joins us for two hours to talk about U.S. foreign policy. If you know Scott, he can roll all day on this subject. Check out the Scott Horton show here and support him.
"Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." -John Adams
Welcome to Patriot's Lament. We strive here to educate ourselves on Liberty. We will not worry ourselves so much with the daily antics of American politics, and drown ourselves in the murky waters of the political right or left.
Instead, we will look to the Intellectuals and Champions of Liberty, and draw on their wisdom of what it is to be a truly free people. We will learn from where our Providential Liberties are derived, and put the proper perspective of a Free Individual and the State.
Please join us!
Welcome to Patriot's Lament. We strive here to educate ourselves on Liberty. We will not worry ourselves so much with the daily antics of American politics, and drown ourselves in the murky waters of the political right or left.
Instead, we will look to the Intellectuals and Champions of Liberty, and draw on their wisdom of what it is to be a truly free people. We will learn from where our Providential Liberties are derived, and put the proper perspective of a Free Individual and the State.
Please join us!
Showing posts with label Patriot's Lament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patriot's Lament. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Thursday, July 3, 2014
Gary North on Patriot's Lament
Gary North joined us the other day and we talked about education and the Ron Paul curriculum that he has developed.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Becky Akers "Blimp over Bluffdale"
Becky Akers post to the LRC blog the other day this piece about not playing patty cake with the Devil's minions.
"Shaming, isolating, and shunning government’s leeches worked for the American colonists; they dealt so severely with friends and family assisting the British Empire’s tyranny that few Americans dared do so. The Crown had to import from England those “swarms of officers” that the Declaration denounced. The same tactics still work. Are you friends with a bureaucrat or cop? Why? Are your children or siblings contemplating positions with Leviathan? Let them know you take such attacks on freedom personally and that as enemies of all mankind, they can no longer expect a welcome in your home. Don’t be shy about telling the rest of the family your reasons for excluding the miscreant, either."
I think this is such an important tactic that we don't use to it's fullness. It is in the same vein as I wrote in Friends? a while back.
Why do you want to even associate with a person who is willing to see you thrown in a cage? Who is willing to support the State and all it's works?
Are you friends with a bureaucrat or cop? Why?
Exactly. Why? Do you think just because you are their friend somehow they will all of a sudden not do as their god Leviathan commands? Even if it is against you.
Good luck.
There is even a biblical lesson to this(1st Corinthians 5:5). It is not to reject them just to hate them, but to show your disdain for their choice to serve the State. With the hope of bringing them out of their willful, ignorant Statism.
If we take our Liberty and the Liberty of our fellow man seriously, we will not be complicit with the enemies of freedom. We will not fellowship with thieves and murderers, no matter what they call it; protection, government, taxation, national interest, public good.
Have nothing to do with them. Let righteous social pressure push them out of our communities, as it should be.
"Shaming, isolating, and shunning government’s leeches worked for the American colonists; they dealt so severely with friends and family assisting the British Empire’s tyranny that few Americans dared do so. The Crown had to import from England those “swarms of officers” that the Declaration denounced. The same tactics still work. Are you friends with a bureaucrat or cop? Why? Are your children or siblings contemplating positions with Leviathan? Let them know you take such attacks on freedom personally and that as enemies of all mankind, they can no longer expect a welcome in your home. Don’t be shy about telling the rest of the family your reasons for excluding the miscreant, either."
I think this is such an important tactic that we don't use to it's fullness. It is in the same vein as I wrote in Friends? a while back.
Why do you want to even associate with a person who is willing to see you thrown in a cage? Who is willing to support the State and all it's works?
Are you friends with a bureaucrat or cop? Why?
Exactly. Why? Do you think just because you are their friend somehow they will all of a sudden not do as their god Leviathan commands? Even if it is against you.
Good luck.
There is even a biblical lesson to this(1st Corinthians 5:5). It is not to reject them just to hate them, but to show your disdain for their choice to serve the State. With the hope of bringing them out of their willful, ignorant Statism.
If we take our Liberty and the Liberty of our fellow man seriously, we will not be complicit with the enemies of freedom. We will not fellowship with thieves and murderers, no matter what they call it; protection, government, taxation, national interest, public good.
Have nothing to do with them. Let righteous social pressure push them out of our communities, as it should be.
Anarchist Highway
Who will build the roads? I have been asked this question enough times to make my head hurt, as most free market Libertarians have. Libertarian scholars much wiser than I have answered this question, but the inevitable follow up is, "Is there an example you can point to where this would work?"
I think
there is.
The Dalton Highway, otherwise known to Alaskans as the Haul Road, is what I think is the closest
example to an Anarchist road in America.
Financed in 1974
by the State and different oil companies and built by Alyeska Pipeline Services,
the Haul Road was built to service the North Slope oil fields of Alaska.
Alyeska maintained the road until the State of Alaska took over this service. This
"service" is such that, just this year, a 150-mile stretch of the
road was so bad that 15 mph was too fast to travel. A truck driver hopped into
a State road grader and did a little road maintenance himself for about 30
miles; it turned out to be the best stretch of the road. The State was quite
miffed because one person did that much during a time the DOT was complaining
about lack of funding (but no one will rat out the driver who did it). The trip
to Deadhorse is nearly 500 miles from Fairbanks, the industry hub for the oil
fields.
There is one
private "truck stop" on the route at the halfway point, Coldfoot, population of about 10. In the 12 years that I have driven
the route, I have seen maybe a dozen Alaska State troopers on the road. For the
most part, you can travel to Deadhorse back and forth for an entire winter and
not see a cop. You would think that this would mean the road is in total,
constant chaos, with road rage in abundance and crime around every corner.
Not so. The
truck drivers that operate on the road have an unwritten code of ethics that
provides for a safe trip on an otherwise dangerous road. Every driver governs
himself. While the State does have a speed limit, it is rarely followed when
the road is in good condition. But when two trucks meet on the narrow roadway,
they slow down to a safe speed of around 35 mph or less, so they won't
"rock" each other from loose gravel on the mostly gravel road. There
is no State law requiring this, but it is a soon-to-be-sorry trucker who is new
to the road, who won't listen to friendly advice and who decides he wants to
drive in an uncourteous manner, not slowing down when meeting oncoming traffic.
If you are known to rock other trucks, the word spreads quickly, and when you
meet a few trucks together, they will put the hammer down and make sure to rock
your truck. Everyone on the road
knows who "that guy" is; the law says he can drive 50 mph and by
golly, he is going to.
After a few
windshields and the paint being literally rocked off his truck, he gets the
point, and becomes a courteous fellow. Social pressure at its finest.
The weather
on the road can drop below -50 in the winter, and although the law doesn't
require anyone to stop and help a stranded truck driver, again the word will
get out that you don't want to be a nice guy. Since it is not a matter of if,
but when, you yourself will break down, you put yourself in harm's way; no one
will stop to help you. There is no cell phone service for about 450 miles of
the trip, and AAA is out of the question. Your life literally depends on how
you treat your neighbor. Company rivalries, feuds and squabbles that may happen
in town, all go by the wayside. There are several accidents that happen on the road every year, and everyone stops to
help. Troopers rarely, if ever, are called out, and somehow the incidents seem
to take care of themselves. Within a day or so, the accident is completely
cleaned up, no citations are issued, and the road continues to operate. Private
insurance picks up the tab.
A couple
years ago there was one nasty person who happens to be employed as a revenue
officer by the North Slope Borough, known in other terms as a cop. This armed
bureaucrat took his job of being a protector to great lengths, and was known to
be very uncourteous, to rock oncoming traffic, to write numerous citations of
protection, and was quite arrogant to others on the CB radio. He had a badge
and he let you know it. He was a jerk. One fine day when the temperature was
hanging around -50, his car broke down, a couple of hours from his home base of
Deadhorse. No one would help him. No one even cared that he was broke down. He
had to sit in his car and wait for a Borough tow truck to come rescue him. I
hope he got a little chilly. He now rarely roams the road looking for people to
protect. He gets it now.
When you
arrive to the oilfields of the North Slope, you are required to stop at a
security gate before you can gain access to the 200,000 + acre field, operated
and maintained by various oil company operators. This is not a State check
point, it is the entrance to a free market society. All of the roads around the oil field
to the different drilling sites are built and maintained by the different oil
companies.
The guards are usually very friendly and accommodating, they
are private persons making a living like you. They have no weapons, (although
some do carry guns for protection against bears). When you are on the field you
agree to follow the posted speeds, and various traffic and safety rules that
the oil companies have made. There are various security folks driving around,
and they will pull you over if you are flagrantly breaking a rule.
But no State cops.
My brother was pulled over for speeding recently, the
security guy was nice, explained to him why he pulled him over and said, "
I am going to write you up unless there was an emergency reason for your
speeding, but there is no monetary fine or penalty involved. But I have to warn
you if you get 3 of these you won't be permitted back onto the field, but you
can appeal this".
It was very cold out so my brother said, "let's go sit
in your vehicle I want to talk to you about a few things". My brother got
into his pickup and explained how they were engaging in a voluntary law society
right then (while this guy is writing him up), and how since there was no force
involved or implied, neither party felt threatened. My brother told how it was
in his best interest to follow the rules so he could make a living on the oil
field, and yet he wasn't forced to be there and no one was going to shoot him
in the head for breaking a simple rule. A monetary loss if you decide to be
stupid since you won't be allowed to work there anymore, but no force is
involved, and it's all voluntary. The security guy really got the idea, and
said he thought it could work in every day society as well, you have a private
road, obey the rules or they don't allow you to use their property.
My brother has commented to me that at no time has he ever
felt threatened when working there, or interacting with security, and I can say
I have never felt threatened either, which is a far cry from when I see
flashing blue and red lights from a car of a person who wishes to give me a
little State protection.
I have not heard of anyone being murdered there, in fact I
have heard of little to no crime, and there are about 30,000 plus people
working up there at any given time. It is its own sprawled out city.
Imagine
that, a lesson in Anarchy, a free society example, being put into practice by
those giant, evil, oil corporations.
The next time you see a car broken down by the side of the
road, with cars speeding by consider that the Officers of Justice [sic] threaten
to fine individuals not licensed by the state who try to show real compassion
to their fellow men. In
Alaska, you can be given a citation from the State for stopping to help someone
pull their car out of a ditch. Or a fender- bender with a cop eagerly writing a
citation, not so the person at fault can pay restitution to the person he hit,
but so the State can get its fair share, you can thank the roadfare/welfare
State, who in its infinite wisdom of owning all roads has destroyed the meaning
of self-ownership of the people driving on them, and made them forget the value
of their neighbor.
And when
people ask you "Who will build the roads?" and insist that it just
won't work, you can point to the Haul Road of Alaska, the Anarchist road of
America.
Saturday, May 24, 2014
Geo-politics and Ukranian secession
Geo-Politics. This is what Richard Maybury is going to be talking with us about today on the Patriot's Lament radio show. I know we are going to be talking about the Russia/Ukraine/USA conflict.
I am mind boggled myself over this whole situation. The US government gets caught talking about spending $5 billion to support a coup and put in their own puppet government, the US government spin was that the Ukrainians have the right to their own self determination,(on this point I agree 100%, all people, every individual should be the owner of their own self and decide what they will or will not subject themselves to).
So there is a coup, and obviously the US sets up the government they want in place of the one that was in power. Then eastern Ukraine, Crimea in particular, votes to secede from Ukraine, and the US government all of a sudden does a 180 and says the Ukrainian people don't have a right to self determination. Of course Russia is blamed, but from what little I know, the eastern Ukrainians are basically ethnic Russians, and because of earlier State edicts, they were given to Ukraine. Like trading around cattle.
I'm not a cheerleader for the Russian State, I am against EVERY State, but I have to ask, why can't ALL the Ukrainian folks have self determination? If the eastern Ukrainians want to secede, and be apart of Russia, why not let them? Whether they want an autonomous state, or to live in an Anarchist state, what business is it of ANYONE'S except theirs?
Hans Hoppe argues for individual secession, and I like that idea. Why can't folks just live the lives they want, and be loyal, or disloyal, to whomever they want?
And more important, what business is it of anyone else?
I can see by looking at the "stats" on my blog, that we have folks from Russia and Ukraine that visit the blog. No, it doesn't tell me who anyone is, just that we had visits from these places.
So, if you are from Russia, or Ukraine, please, I don't know what is really going on, so tell us in your own words. Leave a comment.
For the rest of us, we should ask, why should any entity be able to tell any individual who or what they must obey or follow?
America was founded on secession, shouldn't Americans support secession movements anywhere in the world? I certainly do. If humans have the right to self ownership, we have the right to secede. If we don't have the right to secede, then we are merely slaves to the State that claims to own us.
Independence from the State should be our goal.
I am mind boggled myself over this whole situation. The US government gets caught talking about spending $5 billion to support a coup and put in their own puppet government, the US government spin was that the Ukrainians have the right to their own self determination,(on this point I agree 100%, all people, every individual should be the owner of their own self and decide what they will or will not subject themselves to).
So there is a coup, and obviously the US sets up the government they want in place of the one that was in power. Then eastern Ukraine, Crimea in particular, votes to secede from Ukraine, and the US government all of a sudden does a 180 and says the Ukrainian people don't have a right to self determination. Of course Russia is blamed, but from what little I know, the eastern Ukrainians are basically ethnic Russians, and because of earlier State edicts, they were given to Ukraine. Like trading around cattle.
I'm not a cheerleader for the Russian State, I am against EVERY State, but I have to ask, why can't ALL the Ukrainian folks have self determination? If the eastern Ukrainians want to secede, and be apart of Russia, why not let them? Whether they want an autonomous state, or to live in an Anarchist state, what business is it of ANYONE'S except theirs?
Hans Hoppe argues for individual secession, and I like that idea. Why can't folks just live the lives they want, and be loyal, or disloyal, to whomever they want?
And more important, what business is it of anyone else?
I can see by looking at the "stats" on my blog, that we have folks from Russia and Ukraine that visit the blog. No, it doesn't tell me who anyone is, just that we had visits from these places.
So, if you are from Russia, or Ukraine, please, I don't know what is really going on, so tell us in your own words. Leave a comment.
For the rest of us, we should ask, why should any entity be able to tell any individual who or what they must obey or follow?
America was founded on secession, shouldn't Americans support secession movements anywhere in the world? I certainly do. If humans have the right to self ownership, we have the right to secede. If we don't have the right to secede, then we are merely slaves to the State that claims to own us.
Independence from the State should be our goal.
Friday, May 16, 2014
Ron Paul Curriculum with its designer and implementor
Patriot's Lament is proud to host the designer and implementor of the Ron Paul Curriculum on Saturday, May 17, in the first hour (9am AK time).
Dr. Gary North was Ron Paul's original staff economist and has written extensively on history, economics and theology. You can read his writings at Lew Rockwell, Tea Party Economist and Specific Answers.
The topic of discussion will likely center around the 26 reasons to adopt the Ron Paul Curriculum today, and 4 reasons not to.
http://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com/public/3346.cfm
Other resources:
http://tomwoods.com/blog/why-the-ron-paul-homeschool-curriculum-heres-why/
http://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com
Dr. Gary North was Ron Paul's original staff economist and has written extensively on history, economics and theology. You can read his writings at Lew Rockwell, Tea Party Economist and Specific Answers.
The topic of discussion will likely center around the 26 reasons to adopt the Ron Paul Curriculum today, and 4 reasons not to.
http://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com/public/3346.cfm
http://tomwoods.com/blog/why-the-ron-paul-homeschool-curriculum-heres-why/
http://www.ronpaulcurriculum.com
Monday, May 5, 2014
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Becky Akers with Patriot's Lament
Here is Becky when she joined us on our radio program on April 5. There were several times I was speechless.
Becky tells it like it is with no apologies.
Thank you Becky!!
Becky Akers with Patriot's Lament hour 1
Becky Akers with Patriot's Lament hour 2
Becky tells it like it is with no apologies.
Thank you Becky!!
Becky Akers with Patriot's Lament hour 1
Becky Akers with Patriot's Lament hour 2
Friday, April 4, 2014
Becky Akers
Becky Akers will be joining us again tomorrow at 9 am Alaskan time on the Patriot's Lament radio show. Don't miss it, it's going to be good!!
Becky Akers on LRC
Becky Akers on LRC
Good Citizen
A friend of mine emailed me an article titled "Home Schoolers make good citizens".
The first thing that ran through my mind was, "If home schoolers make good citizens, those parents are doing it wrong."
Is being a good citizen even something we should strive to achieve? Should we teach our kids to be one? Or should we be and teach our children to be "good people"?
What is a good citizen?
One of the definitions of "citizen" in the Merriam-Webster online dictionary is: " a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to protection from it".
You can be a good citizen and not follow the non-aggression principle. In fact, a good citizen supports his government in aggressing against his own neighbor, and teaches his children this is good.
You can be a good citizen, and support the immoral wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and actually, we are told you are a bad citizen if you don't support every war or invasion the government decides it wants.
A good citizen will submit to a cop beating him and not show even the least bit of resistance. A good citizen knows that it is his duty to take the beating and, if he really doesn't think he earned this form of protection, the good citizen can plead his case against the beating before a court, if he survives the beating.
A good citizen turns a blind eye to another good citizen getting beaten by a cop, knowing that the good citizen must have done something to earn this act of protection.
To be a good citizen one must give every penny the government says he owes in taxation, and he must be happy about it, and about where the money is spent. The good citizen doesn't "cheat" the government on his tax returns, knowing the government needs that money in order to pay for cops to beat him and his neighbor, and to fight the wars it wants.
A good citizen votes in every election he can, and accepts the choices the government gives him to vote for and on.
A good citizen pledges allegiance to his government and doesn't question anything it does, period.
No thanks.
A good person, on the other hand, knows it is wrong to initiate violence against his neighbor, whether his neighbor lives next door to him or in another country, and whether he does it himself or has his government do it for him.
A good person not only is against wars of aggression, but he speaks out against them, and teaches his children to live in peace.
A good person knows he has the right to defend himself, and that a badge and a costume does not give anyone the right to violate him, or his neighbor.
A good person does not happily pay the extortion money the government demands from him, and uses every loophole and opportunity he can to keep his property for himself.
A good person does not pledge himself to a government, but pledges to live in peace with his fellow man, and follows the golden rule.
To you Christians, the Bible says you are not even citizens of this world (Philippians 3:19), so why do you think it honorable to be good earthly citizens?
My wife and I homeschool our 8 children (this year they are using the Ron Paul curriculum), and I will not teach them to be good citizens; rather, I will continue to teach them to be good people.
We have to decide for ourselves if we would rather be a good citizen, or a good person. I don't want to be a good citizen, in fact, I want to be a bad citizen.
Let us be good people. That should be our goal. That is what we should strive to be.
The first thing that ran through my mind was, "If home schoolers make good citizens, those parents are doing it wrong."
Is being a good citizen even something we should strive to achieve? Should we teach our kids to be one? Or should we be and teach our children to be "good people"?
What is a good citizen?
One of the definitions of "citizen" in the Merriam-Webster online dictionary is: " a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to protection from it".
You can be a good citizen and not follow the non-aggression principle. In fact, a good citizen supports his government in aggressing against his own neighbor, and teaches his children this is good.
You can be a good citizen, and support the immoral wars of aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and actually, we are told you are a bad citizen if you don't support every war or invasion the government decides it wants.
A good citizen will submit to a cop beating him and not show even the least bit of resistance. A good citizen knows that it is his duty to take the beating and, if he really doesn't think he earned this form of protection, the good citizen can plead his case against the beating before a court, if he survives the beating.
A good citizen turns a blind eye to another good citizen getting beaten by a cop, knowing that the good citizen must have done something to earn this act of protection.
To be a good citizen one must give every penny the government says he owes in taxation, and he must be happy about it, and about where the money is spent. The good citizen doesn't "cheat" the government on his tax returns, knowing the government needs that money in order to pay for cops to beat him and his neighbor, and to fight the wars it wants.
A good citizen votes in every election he can, and accepts the choices the government gives him to vote for and on.
A good citizen pledges allegiance to his government and doesn't question anything it does, period.
No thanks.
A good person, on the other hand, knows it is wrong to initiate violence against his neighbor, whether his neighbor lives next door to him or in another country, and whether he does it himself or has his government do it for him.
A good person not only is against wars of aggression, but he speaks out against them, and teaches his children to live in peace.
A good person knows he has the right to defend himself, and that a badge and a costume does not give anyone the right to violate him, or his neighbor.
A good person does not happily pay the extortion money the government demands from him, and uses every loophole and opportunity he can to keep his property for himself.
A good person does not pledge himself to a government, but pledges to live in peace with his fellow man, and follows the golden rule.
To you Christians, the Bible says you are not even citizens of this world (Philippians 3:19), so why do you think it honorable to be good earthly citizens?
My wife and I homeschool our 8 children (this year they are using the Ron Paul curriculum), and I will not teach them to be good citizens; rather, I will continue to teach them to be good people.
We have to decide for ourselves if we would rather be a good citizen, or a good person. I don't want to be a good citizen, in fact, I want to be a bad citizen.
Let us be good people. That should be our goal. That is what we should strive to be.
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Monday, September 2, 2013
To U.S. soldiers
The ramp up to war with Syria is in high gear. The power crazed politicians mean to have war one way or the other. Under the pretense of an obvious false flag (the Syrian government using chemical weapons), the rulers of the American Empire are ready to kill. And they will. And innocent people who have done nothing to Americans will die at the hands of Americans.
But none of these crazed individuals in the U.S. government will fire a shot. None of them will.
They count on the American soldier to kill for them, and to advance their agenda for the Middle East.
The argument that these weapons somehow threaten America is even more ridiculous than the lies made to get us into the Iraq war. The U.S. State lied to the whole world, and sent American soldiers there to kill for them, turning America into the aggressor, and American soldiers killed innocent people that had done nothing to nor threatened the American people.
But Bush didn't fire a weapon. Cheney and Rumsfeld never fired a shot.
You, American soldier, did.
So today, you are being told that you will be sent to fight Syria. So I have to ask you, will you?
Are you going to kill Syrians that pose no threat to America? Is that why you joined the armed forces? When you gave your oath to the Constitution of the United States, did it mean anything to you? How is the Syrian "enemy" threatening America? How are the moms, dads, sons and daughters that are going to die a threat to you or the American people? And if they are not, how can you justify killing them?
America has fought a long war supposedly against our named enemy, Al-Qaeda. It is a known fact that the rebels fighting against the Syrian government are fighters, of Al-Qaeda. By attacking Syria, you will be directly helping Al-Qaeda, the very enemy your government has had you fighting for 12 years. Are you willing to do that? Wouldn't this be counter thinking to any sane person? Why have you been fighting Al-Qaeda only to help them now?
You, American Soldier, can refuse. You are the ones who have to pull the trigger, you can be the ones who say no. The American people are counting on you. People of the whole world are counting on you. Little kids in Syria are counting on you. If you don't, you, soldier, will be the ones responsible for killing innocent people, not your government, not Obama, not McCain, YOU. Yes you, even Americans are not immune from being war criminals.
You have a duty to say no, as the Nuremberg Trials showed. This will not be a Just War. This will just be a war.
Murder.
You do not have to continue to be fodder for the American Empire, which preys on your feelings of loyalty to your comrades to get you to do Its bidding.
Strike a real blow for freedom. Refuse to go. Refuse to attack Syria. The lovers of Liberty will stand with you. You officers in the military, it's time you actually lead. You know you have the Right to refuse un-Constitutional orders. You have a duty to refuse. Don't ask your men to be war criminals. History WILL judge you.
God will Judge you.
It's never Treason to do that which is Right.
Resolve to serve no more!
"All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling
in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves? You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows—
to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free.
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces."
ÉTIENNE DE LA BOÉTIE
But none of these crazed individuals in the U.S. government will fire a shot. None of them will.
They count on the American soldier to kill for them, and to advance their agenda for the Middle East.
The argument that these weapons somehow threaten America is even more ridiculous than the lies made to get us into the Iraq war. The U.S. State lied to the whole world, and sent American soldiers there to kill for them, turning America into the aggressor, and American soldiers killed innocent people that had done nothing to nor threatened the American people.
But Bush didn't fire a weapon. Cheney and Rumsfeld never fired a shot.
You, American soldier, did.
So today, you are being told that you will be sent to fight Syria. So I have to ask you, will you?
Are you going to kill Syrians that pose no threat to America? Is that why you joined the armed forces? When you gave your oath to the Constitution of the United States, did it mean anything to you? How is the Syrian "enemy" threatening America? How are the moms, dads, sons and daughters that are going to die a threat to you or the American people? And if they are not, how can you justify killing them?
America has fought a long war supposedly against our named enemy, Al-Qaeda. It is a known fact that the rebels fighting against the Syrian government are fighters, of Al-Qaeda. By attacking Syria, you will be directly helping Al-Qaeda, the very enemy your government has had you fighting for 12 years. Are you willing to do that? Wouldn't this be counter thinking to any sane person? Why have you been fighting Al-Qaeda only to help them now?
You, American Soldier, can refuse. You are the ones who have to pull the trigger, you can be the ones who say no. The American people are counting on you. People of the whole world are counting on you. Little kids in Syria are counting on you. If you don't, you, soldier, will be the ones responsible for killing innocent people, not your government, not Obama, not McCain, YOU. Yes you, even Americans are not immune from being war criminals.
You have a duty to say no, as the Nuremberg Trials showed. This will not be a Just War. This will just be a war.
Murder.
You do not have to continue to be fodder for the American Empire, which preys on your feelings of loyalty to your comrades to get you to do Its bidding.
Strike a real blow for freedom. Refuse to go. Refuse to attack Syria. The lovers of Liberty will stand with you. You officers in the military, it's time you actually lead. You know you have the Right to refuse un-Constitutional orders. You have a duty to refuse. Don't ask your men to be war criminals. History WILL judge you.
God will Judge you.
It's never Treason to do that which is Right.
Resolve to serve no more!
"All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling
in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you. Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had no cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves? You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them, you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows—
to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free.
Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces."
ÉTIENNE DE LA BOÉTIE
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Patriot's Lament Aug 3, 2013: Special Guest Walter Block
In this episode, Dr. Walter Block is our special guest! We have a pretty lively round table discussion,(we argue with Walter, which is way more interesting then just yes men stuff) and a lot of fun. Thank you Walter!
Labels:
660 KFAR,
aaron,
america,
bennett,
joshua,
lrc,
mises,
Patriot's Lament,
voting,
Walter Block
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Patriot's Lament April 20, 2013: Stay In Your Home and Hel San American
In this episode we talk about the USSA Stasi fomenting martial law in Boston, we lament over the fact that the Bostonians bowed like sheep, and there was absolutely no resistance to this tyranny. Welcome to the new America.
Where are Samuel Adams and his Sons of Liberty?
Where are Samuel Adams and his Sons of Liberty?
Patriot's Lament April 13, 2013: Serve The Market and They Dont Own Them
In this episode we talk about Melissa Perry, and her little promo where she says that children are not their parent's, but they belong to the community, and the community should invest in them. We ask at what size does a community or a group of people have to get to to where a arbitrary entity with the monopolized power of force and taxation is needed.
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Special Guest Bob Murphy on Patriot's Lament - October 20, 2012
In this hour we have as our special guest Robert Murphy. Bob talks to us
about his non debate with Krugman, the chicken, and then talks to us
about private society, and how private defense could work and how much
more ethical that would be instead of the State being the monopoly of
protection.
Labels:
aaron,
anarchist,
anarchy,
bennett,
capitalist,
defense,
joshua,
lew,
mises,
Murphy,
Patriot's Lament,
Paul,
private,
Robert,
rockwell,
Ron,
Samuel,
society,
Vanderwaal
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Patriot's Lament August 18, 2012: Flee Babylon and Only The Slaves Participate
In this episode we talk about 1 Samuel 8:10-18
and how we see the same thing today. You have made your choice!! We ask
how Justice can be served by the State that is the ultimate judge of its
own actions. In the second hour we expand on non-participation in this
government, and show how no matter what a politician says or thinks he
believes, once voted into office, power corrupts his mind. Get off your
knees and be free!
Labels:
aaron,
babylon,
bennett,
Freedom,
joshua,
participate,
Patriot's Lament,
republican,
ryan,
slavery,
vote
Sunday, June 3, 2012
Arachno-Capitalism on ice! Patriot's Lament interviews Stefan Molyneux
Stefan Molyneux, host of Freedomain Radio, is interviewed on Alaskan
Radio Patriot's Lament about liberty, voting, financial regulation, philosophy,
integrity, virtue, peace, South Park, and the hope for true human
freedom in the future. Freedomain Radio is the largest and most popular
philosophy show on the web - http://www.freedomainradio.com
Thanks Stefan!
Thanks Stefan!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
